- If a decree for possession is passed on the basis of a compromise between the parties but, when challenged, nothing tangible is brought on the record to satisfy the Court in support of the factum of adverse possession there may be strong inference that a sale has been dressed up as a decree. Mst. Shero Begum v. Abdul Qayyum Khan and others 1993 SCR 296 (A)
- Joint possession — The donee cannot be said not to be a co-sharer in the khewat and if it is so, the decree can be for joint possession only, not for exclusive possession. Muhammad Hussain v. Barkat Hussain & 22 others 2006 SCR 207 (B)
- Any order or decree must not be vague, leaving parties to guess about the decision or to ascertain its terms from some other documents — Decree must be precise, deliberate and couched in legal terminology — It must conform to requirements of Order XX rule 6 C.P.C. Muhammad Irshad & 11 others v. Mst. Hanifa Begum & 8 others 2006 SCR 358 (C)
error: Content is protected !!