Document

  1. If a document is certified on one side it does not need a separate certification on the reverse if something is inscribed thereon — Such authenticity  not a legal requirement. Muhammad Sharif v. Mirza Fazal Hussain and others 1993 SCR 88 (A)
  2. Supreme Court normally does not allow fresh material to be brought on record- Government order being Public document allowed to be placed on record. Muhammad Mushtaq v. Muhammad Faiz Abbasi & others 1994 SCR 95 (G)
  3. Plea that khasra girdawari and Misl-e-Haqiat were fictitious or fake not raised — Under law the presumption of truth is attached to the entries made in Misl-e-Haqiat or Jamabandi. Zafar Iqbal v. Abdul Aziz and another 1997 SCR 258 (B)
  4. Court is not obliged to look into those documents which were not placed on record before High Court. Behram Khan v. Custodian of Evacuee Property & 5 others 1999 SCR 511 (B)
  5. Document Ex. DH relied upon by the defendant-appellant, has also been correctly discarded by the trial Court as the same was not relied upon by the defendant-appellant in his written statement nor in his statement before the Court, it is also stated to have been written on a blank paper which has no evidentiary worth. Abdul Latif v. Safarish Ali Khan 2002 SCR 288 (C)
  6. Documents for and against any claim not furnished before the authority or Tribunal having exclusive jurisdiction cannot be produced for the first time in the High Court. Muhammad Akram & another v. Custodian Evacuee Property and 7 others 2003 SCR 442 (A)
  7. Proof of — The witness from whom the document is being got exhibited has neither prepared the document nor was in possession of the document, hence he could not testify or exhibit document. Muhammad Afzal v. Barkat Ali & another 2006 SCR 186 (A)
  8. Execution of document — Onus of proof — Onus to prove execution of document is always on the person who is beneficiary of such document. Maqsood Ahmad & another v. M.  Razzaque and 9 others. 2009 SCR 38 (A) PLJ 2005 1148, PLD 1997 Lah.633 and 1992 MLD 2515 ref.
  9. —New document in the Supreme Court—it is well established principle of law that document which has not been tendered in evidence before the Courts below cannot for the first time be placed before this Court. WAPDA v. Waheeda Akhtar & others 2017 SCR 457 (B)  2009 SCR 565 rel.
  10. —essential to prove—effect of—not fulfilling.  see Zahoor Ahmed & others v. Muhammad Mehrban & others 2017 SCR 1370 (A,B&C)
error: Content is protected !!