1. Principles for fixation of pay — Sl. No. 36, of Estacode deals with fixation of pay in cases of re-employment. Held: The Estacode is not applicable in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, therefore, the appellant cannot claim any right on the strength of this codal provision. Further held: Keeping in view the principle of parimateria, the guidelines can be taken by the competent authority from this codal provision — Further held: That by analogy it can hold that the appellant is entitled to the same pay and privileges which he was drawing as District and Sessions Judge in BPS-21.  Muhammad Younas v. Azad Govt. & 3 others 2010 SCR 271 (B)
  2. —adaptation by AJK Council—Adaptation of Office Memorandum No. 3/3/59-E VII, dated, 4th June, 1960—Argument: proper procedure provided for rejection of the advice of FPSC, in the ESTACODE, has not been adopted. In this regard, he drew the attention of this Court towards office memorandum No. 3/3/59-E VII, dated 4th June, 1960. However, a query was made to him; whether the AJK Council adapted all the instructions given in the EASTACODE, he was unable to controvert the same; he also failed to substantiate that the referred memorandum had ever been adapted by the Council. Held: Argument repelled.       Shakil Ahamd & others v. AJ&K Council & others 2017 SCR 1318 (D)
error: Content is protected !!