1. The police required the custody of accused for investigation in a case registered at Rawalpindi — Thus the inherent power of the High Court could not be exercised to interfere with the investigation of the police denying the custody of accused. Sanaullah Raja v. M. Shafi and 2 others 1997 SCR 149 (I)
  2. —Murder case—investigation was caried out in lackluster manner—Investigating officers dealt with the murder case are expected to be fair and diligent in their approach and their conduct should always be in conformity with law, procedure and rules and default violation or breach of duty is fatal to the case of prosecution. Malik Zaffar v. Rashid Hussain Shah & others 2022 SCR 1489 (W)
  3. —Defective, careless and negligent investigation and prosecution by police and prosecution—recovery witnesses not entered into challan and not produced before trial Court—Directions issued to the Investigation agencies and prosecution by the Supreme Court in an earlier case were reiterated. Muhammad Khalil Khan v. State & others 2022 SCR 1462 (E) Taimoor alias Qazi v. The State & others, Criminal Appeal No. 32, 35, 36 of 2020, decided on 05.09.2022 ref.
error: Content is protected !!