1. Subsequent review petition filed after a period of more than three years — The ground, taken by respondent that he being in Army service his counsel did not inform him of judgment, is not one of the recognized grounds for condonation of delay — The negligence of a counsel shall be deemed to be the negligence of his client. Mumtaz H.  v. M Fazil Khan and another 2000 SCR 600 (B)
error: Content is protected !!