Administration of Evacuee Property Rules, 1950

  1. —Rules 13—limitation for filing application under section 22 of Evacuee Property Act, 1957 is 60 days. Khurshid Anwar vs Muhammad Altaf & others 2018 SCR 114 (H)
  2. Rule 17(3) — The limitation for filing review petition before the Custodian is 30 days. Muhammad Khaliq & others  v. Custodian Evacuee Property & others  2015 SCR  1229 (A)
  3. —Rule 17(3)—limitation for review—30 days—delay—condonation of— the appellant got knowledge of P.R.T.O dated 18.06.1987 on 31.08.1994— review was filed without furnishing explanation after a period of 7 years— held: delay can be condoned only if sufficient cause is furnished, otherwise law expects due diligence, care and consciousness from the litigant seeking redressal of its grievance through a legal process—term “sufficient cause” is such a cause which is beyond the control of a party. Muhammad Rasheed & others v. Custodian Evacuee Property & others  2022 SCR 247  (A,B & C) 2016 SCR 90 and PLJ 2001 SC (AJK) 368 ref
  4. —Rule, 17 (3) — limitation for filing review petition before the Custodian of Evacuee Property is 30 days—It is a settled principle of law that a party seeking the condonation of delay has to satisfactorily explain the delay of each and every day. Muhammad Latif  v. Shahzad Khan & others 2022 SCR 1448 (A) 2016 SCR 90 ref.
  5. — Rule 17 (3) — limitation — delay — condonation of — u/r 17 (3); the limitation for filing review petition before Custodian is 30 days — the respondents neither filed any application for condonation of delay nor any affidavit in support of review petition — review rightly dismissed by Custodian on the point of limitation.  Tariq Hussain versus Anwar Begum & others 2023 SCR 870 (A&B) 2021 SCR 302, 2016 SCR 90 & PLJ 2001 (SC AJ&K) 368 ref.
  6. Rule 17(3) — limitation for filing review — limitation under rule 17(3) is 30 days for filing review petition — appellants neither mentioned exact date of knowledge nor filed application for condonation of delay — held: party seeking condonation of delay has to satisfactorily explain the delay of each & every day. Muhammad Rasheed Khan & 10 others vs Custodian Evacuee Property 05 others 2024 SCR 187 (B) 2016 SCR 90, & 2022 SCR 1448 PLJ 2001 SC (AJ&K) 368 ref.
  7. —Rule 17(6) — every application for review before the Custodian shall be accompanied by a certified copy of order appealed against—review was not accompanied by the certified copy of P.R.T.O. held: the application before Custodian was not maintainable— when a provision of law or statute provides a particular manner for performance of an act, then such act must be performed in the prescribed manner alone or not at all. Muhammad Rasheed & others v. Custodian Evacuee Property & others  2022 SCR 247  (D) 2012 SCR 213 & 2014 SCR 382 ref
  8. Rule 17 (E) — review — limitations for filing review is 30 days.  Mahmood Ahmed versus Custodian & 10 others 2016 SCR 90 (A)
error: Content is protected !!