1. Rescision of an early order by the President — President’s power to do so — Cannot be looked into by Supreme Court as the same was not challenged before the High Court – Power of Supreme Court limited. M. Siddique Farooqi v. Ghulam Mustafa Mughal & others 1992 SCR 39 (C)
  2. Orders without jurisdiction can be challenged before the Service Tribunal. The High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain writs relating to service matters. Jurisdiction of High Court stands ousted. Accountant General and others v.  Zaman Hussain Khan 1993 SCR 259 (B)
  3. An order passed in different circumstances cannot be regarded as discriminatory — It would be discriminatory only if different orders are passed in identical circumstances or distinction drawn between two or more persons is artificial and un-reasonable. M. Anwar Khan v. AJK Govt. and 2 others 1998 SCR 19 (B)
  4. The order of the Court must be clear, lucid and speaking — It should be based on facts and law — All the disputed points should be dealt with in an analytical manner — One should feel due consideration has been given to the facts, law and contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties. Rashad Saleem v. Ch. Zafar Iqbal and 10 others 2009 SCR 18 (B)
  5. The order of the Court should conform with the provision of law — It should contain the facts of the case and the points for consideration — The Court should discuss how the appellant has a prima facie case, balance of convenience and how irreparable loss will cause in case of refusal of interim relief — Nothing such like was considered by the learned Judge of the High Court. Rashad Saleem v. Ch. Zafar Iqbal and 10 others 2009 SCR 18 (C)
error: Content is protected !!