- The finding which has attained finality by the lapse of time or on account of conduct of the parties cannot be re-opened as that finding become past and closed transaction. University of AJ&K and 6 others v. Engineer Muhammad Khaild 2004 SCR 84 (A)
- In appellant’s case conditions and privileges equal to Judge of the High Court were determined on 31.5.1978 — Pension calculated in the year 2000 according to formula applicable to civil servants — vires of para 16 of the High Court Judges (Leave Pension and Privileges) Order, 1997, not challenged, which is still on the statute. Held: The pension case finalized in 2000, has now become past and closed transaction — The appellant if had any grievance at that time, was at liberty to challenge the vires of the notification, which has not been done. Bostan Ch. v. Audit and Accountants Deptt.& 6 others 2011 SCR 279 (F)
- — findings attained finality by the lapse of time or verdict of a Court or Tribunal cannot be reopened being past and closed transaction. Syed Fida Hussain Kazmi versus Tariq Mehmood Khan & others 2023 SCR 840 (B) 2004 SCR 84
error: Content is protected !!