Petition for leave to appeal

  1. Service appeal — Status quo order — Controversy raised in this petition can be decided without admitting the petition for leave to appeal — If allowed the parties shall drag in unnecessary protracted litigation — Service Tribunal is set up to get the service matter resolved as early as possible — Held:  Parties shall appear before the Service Tribunal and the Tribunal shall provide the right of hearing to the parties and pass self-speaking order on the application for issuance of order of status quo — Till that time status quo issued by the Service Tribunal shall remain in force. Muhammad Saber Khan v. Raja Javed Iqbal and 4 others 2004 SCR 95 (A)
  2. Cannot be allowed in routine. Muhammad Kbir Khan  v. Mst. Anees Begum 2005 SCR 23 (B)
  3. P.L.A. cannot be allowed just to create false hopes. Walayat Khan v. Abdul Khaliq & 15 others 2006 SCR 92 (B)
  4. Very strong grounds are required to grant leave particularly when there is concurrent finding of facts recorded by the Courts below. M. Mehrban v. M. Siddique & 2 other 2006 SCR 225 (B)
  5. P.L.A. dismissed in default — Effect of — A petition dismissed in default of appearance cannot be restored by a Court of law in routine — It can be restored only if a cause beyond the control of a party is disclosed. Sardar M. Rafique Khan  v. Azad Govt. & 7 others 2006 SCR 401 (A)
  6. The petition for leave to appeal cannot be allowed as routine rather one of the requirements for grant of leave to appeal is that a question of substantial legal importance should be placed before the Court. Gul Nisa Zaffar v. Muhammad Farooq Khan 2007 SCR 537 (B)
  7. Leave cannot be granted as a routine. Mirpur Development Authority and 3 others v. Ch. Aarif Najeeb & 13 others 2007 SCR 545 (D)
  8. The petition for leave to appeal cannot be accepted on flimsy grounds rather very strong reasons are required to indulge in concurrently recorded findings by the lower Courts. Muhammad Din v. Abdul Hameed & another 2008 SCR 292 (C)
  9. Leave to appeal cannot be granted unless a flagrant disregard of the substantive law or procedure has been committed. Azmat Bi & another v. Muhammad Laal 2008 SCR 300 (B)
  10. Petition for leave to appeal — Grant of — P.L.A. cannot be granted as a routine. Very strong grounds are required for indulgence of the Supreme Court. Ch. Muhammad Sadiq v. Mujahid Hussain Naqvi 2008 SCR 313 (B)
  11. Grant of leaeve — leave cannot be granted in every case only to create a false hope to a litigant. Rafaqat Hussain & 7 others v. Azad Govt. & 11 others 2016 SCR 1302 (B) 
  12. —According to the settled principle of law, leave cannot be granted in routine mere for the purpose of fruitless litigation. Farooq Ahmed vs Custodian & others 2018 SCR 1 (C)
  13. —grant of—question of public importance—prerequisite— leave cannot be granted to create false hopes in the mind of a party. I.G Police Prisons vs Shezaib Ali & others 2018 SCR 409 (D)
  14. Leave cannot be granted for false hope or academic discussion. Azad Govt.& others vs Syed Zhoor Hussain Shah &others 2018 SCR 876 (C)      
  15. —principle for grant of leave—see caption Mohsin Shezad v. Director Excise & Taxation 2019 SCR 589 (D)
  16.                 —Leave cannot be granted in routine for the purpose of fruitless litigation. Farooq Ahmed Butt Versus Azad Govt. & 8 others 2021 SCR 284 (C)
  17. —Leave cannot be granted in routine for the purpose of fruitless litigation. Maryam Saeed  versus District Education Officer & 7 others 2021 SCR 319 (B)
  18. —Leave cannot be granted in each and every case only to give false hope to a party. Muhammad Sameeb Khan v.                      AJ&K P.S.C & others 2022 SCR 552 (E)
  19.  —-Leave to appeal cannot be granted in each and every case only to create false hope in the mind of a party. Shahzaada Mughal v. Azad Govt. & others 2022 SCR 572 (D)
  20. —According to settled principle of law, leave cannot be granted in every case, just to create false hope in the mind of the litigant. Muhammad Awais versus Full Board of Revenue AJ&K & others 2023 SCR 745 (C)
  21. — Leave cannot be granted in each and every case only to give false hope to a party. Muhammad Nazir & others versus Syed Aziz ul Hassan & others 2023 SCR 943 (D)
  22. — Leave cannot be granted in every case as routine, just to create false hope in the mind of the litigant. Ashfaq Hussain & others versus Mst. Rukhsana Begum & others 2023 SCR 821(B)
  23. — petitioners failed to point out any legal question of public importance involved in PLA which is pre-requisite for grant of leave to appeal. Secretary Higher Education & others versus Mahmoud Husain Jarral & others 2023 SCR 926 (B)
  24. — Leave cannot be granted in every case, just to create false hope in the mind of litigant. Shahid Shabir vs Atif Khan & another 2024 SCR 245 (B)
error: Content is protected !!