Proof

  1. Defence may prove that the medical opinion is not correct. Mehmood Ahmed v. The State 1993 SCR 251 (B)
  2. Person who brings another before a Court or Tribunal or seeks annulment of an order made by a competent authority has to show that findings were incorrect or violation of law has been committed. Gul Bahar  v. Revising Authority 1993 SCR 327 (B)
  3. Fact- Proof follows pleadings — Fact has to be pleaded and then proof has to be furnished. Muhammad Mushtaq  v. Muhammad Faiz Abbasi & others 1994 SCR 95 (D)
  4. A party who challenges the vires of notification on basis of which allotments of certain period were cancelled failed to point out any illegality in the notification — Contention of counsel for the appellants devoid of force is repelled. Rehana Mahmood and 3 others v. Azad Govt. & 5 others 1998 SCR 82 (A)
  5. The quantum of proof in civil cases is different as compared to criminal cases — It is celebrated principle of law that in civil cases only preponderance of probability is to be seen to record findings in favour of parties as compared to criminal cases where offence is to be established beyond reasonable doubt — Held: In a civil case the Courts have to see cumulative effect of all the material placed on record and if such material creates preponderance of probability in favour of a party — That party must win the case. Haji Nazir Ahmad v. Raja M. Saeed and 11 others 2010 SCR 231 (I) PL J 1982 SC (AJK) 116 and PLD 1981 SC (AJ&K) 118 rel.
  6. —It is paramount duty of a party who come to the Court with a specific claim to prove his case through cogent and un-rebutted evidence—mere verbal assertion is not sufficient to get the claimed relief. Tahir Mehmood Ayoub & another v. Collector Land Acquisition & others 2022 SCR 330 (C)
error: Content is protected !!