1. The document was prepared from regulation Register 63 — The trial Court held that the document can be produced at any time — The High Court also held that Regulation Register is a public document, a copy of which can be allowed in the interest of justice — Objection was raised after the document was got exhibited — Held: No error was committed by the trial Court or the High Court justifying interference of this Court. Jamal Din v. Wapda & 2 others 2005 SCR 298 (A)
error: Content is protected !!