1. When the conclusion drawn from the record is wrong and cannot be supported by record, and if the reasons given by the trial Judge are of speculative and artificial nature or the findings given by him are based on no evidence or mis-interpretation of evidence or the conclusion drawn by him about the guilt or innocence of the accused person is perverse or foolish resulting in mis-carriage of justice, the Court of appeal will in such a case re-examine the evidence and draw its own conclusion from it. Muhammad Sadiq v. Raja Muhammad Nasim & others 1996 SCR 215 (H) PLD 1969 SC 398, PLD 1978 SC 10, PLD 1964 SC 26, AIR 1972 SC 677 and 1991 P.Cr.L.J. 508 relied.
error: Content is protected !!