- After framing the issues, respondent was asked to produce evidence but he did not do the needful — However, evidence was not closed — Additional District Judge increased the compensation amount 30% without giving any reason in support of enhancement — Thereafter, the High Court, without adverting to the points raised by the appellants, passed the judgment in favour of respondent and that too without any evidence and without following the procedure under law — Impugned judgment of the Additional District Judge and the High Court set aside — Case remanded to Additional District Judge with the direction to proceed with the hearing of the reference in question under law and decide the matter afresh according to law. Azad Government and 2 others v. Mukhar Saeed Qadri and 2 others 2000 SCR 12 (A)
- Criminal case — Motive — Remand of — Held: When other witnesses of recovery and motive were examined by the prosecution the evidence of P.Ws.9 and 5 was not essential. Abdul Aziz v. Muhammad Lal and 2 others 2000 SCR 375 (B)
- Registration of case — Investigations — Criminal case registered against accused on the direction of High Court — Challan was presented in the Trial Court — Judgment was set aside by the Supreme Court on the technical ground of laches — Held: Ordinarily the investigation never ends — Held: The question which needs for resolution is as to whether the mere fact that the case was registered on the direction of High Court which was set aside by this Court would render the proceeding of investigation illegal and justify the withdrawal of case — Case not properly adverted to the High Court. Abdur Rehman v. Prosecuting Inspector and 15 others 2001 SCR 227 (A)
- Points which goes to the root of the case have not been adverted to by the High Court; despite the fact that the points were argued but the same did not find mention in the impugned judgment — The point of jurisdiction as well as that corporation could be sued without the relevant functionaries are of vital importance and need resolution by the High Court — Case remanded. State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Razzaq & 2 others 2002 SCR 5 (A)
- Objection regarding irregularities committed in appointing an Inquiry Officer or issuance of order of removal from service of appellant or failure of Chairman/Prime Minister of Pakistan in personally perusing, satisfying or signing summary submitted by Auditor General, the case would entail a remand for a de novo trial which would consume one more decade — Held: It would defeat the process of justice — In the interest of justice Supreme Court itself gone through the case, perused charge sheet and reply submitted by the appellant. Raja M. Irshad Khan v. AJK Council and 3 others 2007 SCR 419 (A)
- Appeals accepted — Order of Shariat Court set aside — Cases remanded to Shariat Court — Direction issued to constitute two members bench for hearing all matters when case relates to murder or Qisas, whether in appeal or reference against convection or acquittal as chance of death sentence by Shariat Court in acquittal appeal cannot be excluded. Muhammad Alam & another v. The State 2009 SCR 458 (H)
error: Content is protected !!