- Those who availed the remedy well in time and otherwise deserve relief must be given preference — The High Court had granted relief to the respondents that they deserve their induction on preferential basis — By allowing this relief no error appears to have been committed by the High Court. AJK Govt. and 3 others v. Fahmida Abdul Hussain and 8 others 2001 SCR 368 (A)
- Contention that appellant is placed at serial No. 3 of merit list while respondent No.6 is placed at serial No.5, hence appointment of respondent No.6 is in violation of merit list and same is liable to be quashed — Held: Masood Ahmad (respondent No.6) has been appointed on the basis of a judgment of High Court passed in writ petition No. 580/2000 filed by him on 14.11.2000 — Although he is placed at serial No.5 of merit list after appellant but he sought remedy from the Court well in time and obtained appointment — Appellant did not come to Court well in time — Appeal dismissed. Syed Sakhawat Hussain Shah v. Azad Govet. & 5 others 2006 SCR 381 (A)
- Writ — advertisement for induction in Police Service — non recommendation of candidates against vacant post challenged to — candidate falling in the waiting list at serial No.41 and 42 did not challenge —Petitioner approached the Court for his recommendation — Held: who avail the remedy well in time and otherwise deserves, must be given preference. I.G. Police & 3 others v. Adil Rafique 2016 SCR 552 (A) 2001 SCR 368 rel.
error: Content is protected !!