- Excise duty deposited by appellant in pursuance of legal requirement — Cannot challenge the same on the ground that the retrospective effect cannot be given to an Act. Azad Govt. v. Kashmir Tobacco Industry Ltd 1992 SCR 20 (G & H)
- An order of promotion can be given retrospective effect in favour of a person who was occupying a vacancy in a department. Ejaz Ahmed Khan v. Mehboob Ahmed & others 2005 SCR 242 (A)
- If a vacancy was created by artificial means in that case retrospective effect cannot be given to his promotion against such vacancy but he can claim the benefit of grade and pay of that post which he served for such a long time. Ejaz Ahmed Khan v. Mehboob Ahmed 2005 SCR 242 (D)
error: Content is protected !!