- Decision against the law of the land. — Although a wrong decision is no ground for review but all the same if it is found that the decision of a Court is patently against the law of land, the judgment can be corrected in exercise of review jurisdiction because the policy of law is to administer justice according to law and not in violation of the same — A decision which, without going into deep scrutiny of a question of law, is patently found to be derogatory to a statutory provision is always open to correction in exercise of review jurisdiction — The High Court at the time of imposing the exemplary costs under section 35-A, C.P.C., on the petitioners, did not take note of the provisions contained under section 35-A and Order 41 rule 33, C.P.C. which prohibit an appellate Court to award exemplary costs. Zaighum Saleem Khan v. M. Saleem Khan 2000 SCR 246 (A)
error: Content is protected !!