Allotment of plot

Before deciding the dispute about allotment of plot, parties were not given a hearing — There is no fault in the view taken by the High Court that before passing an adverse order against a party, he should have been given a hearing. Bahar Khan v. M. Siddique Raza 1998 SCR 67 (A)
Chairman Mirpur Development Authority alone had no jurisdictional competence to allot the plot — Allotment in favour of appellant was also made by Chairman — Allotment in favour of respondent made by Chairman Mirpur Development Authority alone — Not sustainable. Abdul Shakoor v. Chairman M.D.A. and 9 others 2000 SCR 354 (B)
Allotments through mini plan adversely effected the utility of another plot also allotted through mini plan — Effect of — Plot No. 151-A was allotted to the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants subsequently marked on the spot as a result of mini plan; similarly plot No.195-A and some other plots were marked as a result of the mini plan as is evident from the site plan placed on the record — The perusal of the maps of the master plan and mini plan, where by plots Nos.150-A and 195-A were marked, shows that the same are situated at some distance from one another, it is not correct to suggest that the marking of plot No.195-A has adversely affected the utility of plot which was allotted to the deceased appellant, the allegation that the approach of the deceased appellant to the mosque had become inconvenience is not substantiated by the record. Abdul Latif Abbasi & 3 others v. Chairman M.D.A. & 6 others 2002 SCR 208 (A)