- Limitation — Mutation was sanctioned in 1956 — Suit filed in 1991 after 35 years — Held: Suit barred by limitation. Muhammad Ashraf Khan and 4 others v. Rehmat Jan 2000 SCR 328 (B)
- The composition of suit may not include every fact, it is only every fact which is necessary for a judgment in favour of a plaintiff. Mehboob Kashmiri & another v. Khurshid Ahmed & another 2011 SCR 492 (D)
- —Premature suit— plaintiffs had no cause of action at the time of institution of suit—- but they were vested with the same during pendency of suit —maintainability of—declaration was sought by the plaintiffs in the life time of donor—but during the pendency of the suit the donor died. Trial Court dismissed the suit —on appeal District Court remanded the case and on appeal filed by the aggrieved High Court dismissed the order of the District Court—contention of donee that the suit could not be filed by the plaintiffs during life time of donor, because none of the rights accrues to the legal heirs in the life time of a Muslim owner—Held: Assuming that the plaintiffs had got no cause of action at the time of institution of suit, however, they were vested with the same during pendency of suit at least on 29. 7. 2013 when donor died or at least from 13.8.2013 when the Court substituted his legal heirs, therefore, the proper course for the Trial Court was to provide the parties an opportunity for leading evidence and thereafter decide the case on merits. Sairan Begum & others v. Sakeena Begum & others 2017 SCR 1093(C&D) 2005 SCMR 890 & PLJ 2003 Lah. 1170 rel.
error: Content is protected !!