- The claim of appellant that the Prime Minister of the time approved two summaries whereby Secretary Services & General Administration was directed to issue a notification appointing the appellant as Custodian of Evacuee Property with terms and conditions which are admissible to a Judge of the High Court — The High Court turned down this objection and held that both these documents are not confidence inspiring for the reason that they have never been placed before the Supreme Court or the High Court — These have never been acted upon and have for the first time seen the light of day when the petitioner’s removal process was initiated — These are not based on any regularly processed file — Both have nothing to do with the Services Department — Held: That the finding of the High Court reflects correct proposition of law. Muhammad Azim Zia v. Nazir Ahmed Qadri & others 2003 SCR 44 (H)
error: Content is protected !!