Trichotomy of Powers 

  1. Domain of the other institution — Courts not to interfere — unless they travel beyond their authority — Under the trichotomy of power and Constitutional scheme, the Courts are not supposed to interfere in the domain of other institutions or authorities unless they travel beyond their constitutional or legal domain. As in the instant case, the issues raised in the writ petition clearly fall within the domain of the Government and Legislative Assembly, thus the Courts cannot pre-empt or interfere in their domain. M. Akhtar & others v.Azad Govt. & others 2016 SCR853 (F) 
  2. –preparation of development schemes—domain of executive—Courts cannot interfere unless schemes made against public interest of Govt. policy—the preparation of schemes is the domain of the competent authorities and the Courts are not supposed to interfere in the preparation of the schemes unless it is shown that the schemes are prepared against the public interest or policy of the Government. Inhabitant of Village Awan Patti & 6 others v.  Azad Govt. & 7 others 2020 SCR 764  (A) 2016 SCR 853 & 2002 SCR 24 rel
  3. —domains of Institutions—provided—Courts, not supposed to interfere in other institutions domain—The authority of the Government to shift the posts, establish the institutions, organize the departments or reorganize the same is provided under the Statute. The Courts are not supposed to interfere in the domain of other institutions. Ch. Latif Akbar & others v. Azad Govt. & others 2017 SCR 305 (F) 2016 SCR 853 rel.
  4. —AJK Interim Constitution Act, 1974—recognizes the principle of trichotomy of powers—the scheme of trichotomy of powers in AJK Interim Constitution Act, is same as provided in the Constitution of Pakistan. Shezad Anwar & others v. Azad Govt. & others 2017 SCR 1541 (A)

error: Content is protected !!