A.C.R

  1. Average remarks — to be read in the ordinary connotation of the words and the same cannot be raised at this stage for the first time. ‘Adverse remarks’. Dr. M. Sharif Chattar v. Azad Government 1993 SCR 129 (B)
  2. Adverse remarks not conveyed within 30 days — Effect of — Held: Could not be read against. Abdul Karim and 5 others  v. Muhammad Nisar and another 1998 SCR 296 (D)
  3. According to Notification dated 26.12.1992, it was enjoined upon the head of the department to send all the ACR’s of the contesting officers to the Selection Board for its perusal. Mehboob-ur-Rehman v. Ishfaq Ahmed & 2 others 1999 SCR 300 (A)
  4. Under Instruction No.37 — Timely communication of report containing adverse remarks is a paramount importance — The whole report containing adverse remarks is to be communicated to the civil servant concerned at the earliest opportunity and in any case within one month from the date the report is countersigned and completed — A serious view should be taken of any failure on the part of the concerned officer/official — In the present case reporting officer was bound to convey the remarks within a  period of thirty days — The purpose of conveying adverse remarks is that the person against whom adverse remarks are recorded should know those remarks so that he may improve his conduct or submit any explanation to his past conduct — In instruction No.40 it has been laid down that if adverse remarks are not communicated such remarks should be ignored for the purpose of promotion and premature  retirement. Ali ZAMAN vs. DIRECTOR GENERAL  HEALTH DEPTT. & 4 others 2002 SCR 384 (A)
  5. A.C.Rs. considered in respect of promotion and demotion of a civil servant, therefore these have got the force of rules which can affect the terms, and conditions of service against which right of an aggrieved civil servant has always been accepted by superior Courts of Pakistan — Held: The view expressed by the Service Tribunal in the present case is contrary to the view repeatedly expressed therefore, it cannot be maintained — The appeal before the Service Tribunal against adverse remarks recorded in ACR is maintainable. Ali Zaman v. Director General Health Deptt. & 4 others 2002 SCR 384 (B)
error: Content is protected !!