Adequate Remedy

  1. University of AJK Act, 1985 — S. 38 — Appeal — Mere fact that the Voice Chancellor agreed with the report of the inquiry officer would not render the provision regarding appeal to the Syndicate as nugatory — If the appellant had any objection that Voice Chancellor should not preside over the meeting of Syndicate he could raise objection to that effect and any other arrangement could be made for presiding over the meeting. Muzaffar Hussain  v. AJK University & 4 others 1998 SCR 23 (A)
  2. If the order has been passed by the Syndicate reconsideration by Syndicate cannot be termed as an adequate remedy. M. Sarwar Ahmad v. The University of AJ&K and others 1998 SCR 350 (C)
  3. State Subject Certificate — Cancellation of — Remedy provided by way of appeal under State Subject Act is not adequate — Similarly the remedy before the Distt. Magistrate as well as the Council is also neither adequate nor efficacious. Iqbal Razzaq Butt  v. Abdus Salam Butt and 6 others 1998 SCR 387 (B)
  4. Appellants against the proprietary rights transfer order can avail the remedy of review petition before the Custodian but without availing the aforesaid adequate remedy they directly filed a writ petition in the High Court which was liable to be dismissed on this sole ground. Manzoor Hussain & 3 others v. Muhammad Akram and 15 others 1999 SCR 471 (A)
error: Content is protected !!