Aggrieved Person

The question of an aggrieved person was not attended to and the writ petition was dismissed in limine — Only the considering one aspect of his grievance — As that matter has not been dealt with in the context as to whether the appellant is an aggrieved person for assailing the impugned order as a citizen — Impugned order set aside — Case remanded to the High Court for decision afresh according to law. Nasir H. Shah v. Conservator of Forests & 2 others 1998 SCR 149 (A)
In advertisement one of the terms and conditions was that if suitable candidates from Muzaffarabad District were not available, the vacancy may be filled in by any suitable candidates from other Districts — Respondent duly participated in the test and interview after going through the terms and conditions of advertisement published by the Public Service Commission and surrendered himself to its jurisdiction — As respondent could not qualify the test, he was not an aggrieved person to challenge the selection of appellant by filing a writ petition. Suleman Ahmed v. Tanveer Ahmed Mir and 3 others 2001 SCR 282 (B)
Objection that the respondent was not an aggrieved person therefore could not file writ — This point was not taken in memo of appeal and also not included in the concise statement — A new point cannot be raised during arguments. Naeem Feroze v. Iqbal Rashid Minhas 2001 SCR 91 (C)