1. Persons holding posts on ad hoc basis as well as holding discretionary posts were treated to have been regularly appointed — The said statute was struck down as being inconsistent with Fundamental Rights No.15 and 17 as well as to the Civil Servants Act, P.S.C. P.S.C. Act and Rules made thereunder. Azad Government v. Muhammad Youns Tahir & other 1994 SCR 341 (A)
  2. What is the purpose and policy of the Act — Question to be resolved first — No material  has been brought on the record to show the purpose for which the Act under challenge has been enacted — Usually it is the smaller group of citizens which complains of discrimination as compared to the main body but here the case is opposite. Azad Govt. v. M. Youns Tahir  1994 SCR 341 (P)
  3. Found to be void being violative of fundamental Right No.15 — All appeals dismissed with costs. Azad Govt. v.  Muhammad Youns Tahir & other 1994 SCR 341 (BBB)
error: Content is protected !!