- There are discrepancies in the statements of the prosecution witnesses — Fate of a criminal case does not totally depend upon the existence of discrepancies in the statements of prosecution witnesses — On the basis of contradiction we do not think that this is a case of acquittal. Muhammad Siddique v. The State and another 2003 SCR 269 (D)
- Accused is attributed to have caused injury above the forehead of deceased — Prima facie even this blame is not supported by medical evidence — The prosecution case as disclosed in the FIR and supported by eye-witnesses is negated in the post-mortem report. Held: No error was committed by the Shariat Court in allowing bail to the accused. Muhammad Jahangir v. Kala Khan and another 2004 SCR 359 (D)
error: Content is protected !!