The mere fact that the evidence of eye-witness is not corroborated by medical legal evidence of eye-witnesses in respect of Aurangzeb and Rang Baz Khan — We cannot discard the entire evidence of eye-witnesses — The maxim fulsus in uno falsus in omni bus’ has since long been discarded — The grain has to be sifted out of the chaff: when main part of the deposition is true, it should not arbitrarily be rejected because of want of veracity, on perhaps some minor point — Where a witness is stated to have given false evidence to implicate some innocent persons besides the real culprits, the whole deposition may not be rejected when the most of evidence which rings true can be legally relied upon. Zahir H. Shah v. Shah Nawaz Khan & others 2000 SCR 123 (E)