- Forgery committed — Task committee was only authorised to “revise” a previous allotment. Since there was no allotment — Forged document was prepared — Thus criminal offence was committed — In the limited jurisdiction under the provision of Contempt of Court Act it is not possible to embark on an enquiry to find out who committed the offence — D.I.G. Mirpur directed to register a case. Shawahid Begum & another v. Municipal Committee & 13 others 1998 SCR 314 (C)
- Every addition or alteration is not forgery — Whenever there is cutting or overwriting it is not fair to rush to the conclusion that there has been forgery or tempering — To reach a correct conclusion each such matter has to be examined with care. Bagh H. v. Municipal Corporation Mirpur and 4 others 2000 SCR 520 (A)
error: Content is protected !!