- Both the witnesses have narrated new story than the one which was narrated by the injured person — Their evidence does not provide corroboration to the statement of Muhammad Shafi — Moreover, the statement of Muhammad Siddique is based on hearsay, therefore, the same to the extent of occurrence is inadmissible in evidence — He also contradicted the F.I.R. Muhammad Siddique v. The State and another 2003 SCR 269 (C)