1. Ipsi-dixit of Police is never binding on Courts — The Courts of law have to apply their judicial mind on the facts and circumstances of each case and if from the material placed on record before the Court, the Court reaches the conclusion that process be issued to summon the accused persons no illegality is committed by the Court but if the Court blindly issues process against the accused person without looking into the material connecting the accused with the commission of offence alleged, this exercise on the part of Court is subject to scrutiny by the superior Courts and the same can be set at naught. M. Arshad v. M. Mushtaq 2003 SCR 204 (C) (PLJ 1995 SC (AJK) 1)rel.
  2. The Courts of law are not bound by the investigation of the police and bail could be refused in spite of the finding of the investigating agency — This is not the sole criteria for acceptance or refusal of bailĀ  — The reports of the investigation officer are to be examined and looked into as to whether a case against an accused has been made out or not. Sagir Ahmed v. Zulfiqar Ahmed & another 2005 SCR 422 (A)
  3. Bail — The Courts of law are not bound by the investigation of the Police — This however, is not the sole criteria for acceptance or refusal of bail application. Saghir Ahmed v. Zulfiqar Ahmed & another 2006 SCR 228 (A)
error: Content is protected !!