Justice

  1. At two previous occasions the appellant requested for postponement of recording of his statement — At both the occasions request had been granted — It follows that the appellant was not prepared to make the statement at previous occasions — It is clear that on 24th April 2000 the appellant was taken by surprise — In view of peculiar circumstances of case ends of justice demand that his statement should not have been recorded. Zahid H. Mirza  v. The State  2000 SCR 524 (A)
  2. Grounds raised were totally ignored by the High Court — In light of the precedence of this Court the case should have remanded to the High Court — As the consolidated judgment dated 14.7.2000 was upheld by this Court, moreover in light of statement of the Director Education 11 posts of female lecturers were lying vacant when advertisement No.2/98 was published — In order to do complete justice the appeal was accepted with the direction that Secretary Education shall calculate the quota for lecturers in Islamic Studies and if the appellant on the basis of her merit-determined by P.S.C. is entitled to be inducted her appointment shall be made on permanent basis against the quota of district Poonch. Sabiha Arif  v. AJ&K Govt. and 7 others 2004 SCR 259 (A)
  3. In order to have complete justice appeal was allowed — The Education Department was directed to pass regular order of appointment of the appellant against the vacancy of district Sudhnooti. Mussarat Begum v. Azad Govt. & 3 others 2004 SCR 386 (C)
  4. Pakistan Medical and Dental Council was impleaded as proforma-respondent without prior permission — However, the opinion expressed by it has bearing on the law which bearing is relevant for just decision of the controversy — Therefore, in order to do complete justice it was taken into consideration. Abdul Ghaffar Sulehria  v. Azad Govt. & 4 others 2004 SCR 417 (E)
error: Content is protected !!