- No premium can be allowed to a negligent party for his indolent and lethargic attitude. Defence Department of Pakistan v. Muhammad Khan and another 2004 SCR 459 (E)
- Under law the parties to litigation are required to remain vigilant — If any order adverse to the interest of any party is recorded by the Court, which is the result of his own negligence, such order is not varied or set aside under law. AJK Council & another v. M. Ishaq 2005 SCR 292 (A)
- Law helps the vigilant and not the indolent. A party who is not vigilant can only blame himself for the negligence committed by him and not the Court. Collector Central Excise & Sales Tax and another v. Javed Minhas & others 2018 SCR 1226 (B)
- —Parties to the litigation should be vigilant—if any adverse order is passed against a party due to his negligence, the party is not entitled to any relief—such adverse order cannot be varied or set aside merely on the ground that the case should necessarily be disposed of on merits. Sabir Hussain & 2 others Versus Abdul Qayyum & 30 others 2021 SCR 375 (A) 2005 SCR 292 rel.
error: Content is protected !!