- The testimony of eye witness sufficiently corroborated by the evidence of doctor, the mere fact that report of Chamical Examiner has not been produced by the prosecution does not detract from the other incriminating evidence against the accused connecting him with the commission of offence, nor an adverse inference could be drawn against the prosecution for non production of the report of the Chemical Examiner. Azhar Aziz v. The State 1996 SCR 225 (B) 1976 SCMR 367 relied
error: Content is protected !!