- Inspector General of Police promoted the appellants as Assistant Sub-Inspector B-9 on the recommendations of Superintendent of Police (Reserve) and A.I.G.(Legal) — In the recommendations it is clearly stated the appellant is an efficient and dutiful officer and out of whole lot deserves promotion — The promotion order of the appellant and the seniority list of A.S.Is. were not challenged — If the repaid promotion order was against the rules then it was bounden duty to proceed against those high officials of the relevant time — It is very easy to say that rapid promotion orders have been obtained by the appellant in connivance with the high officials but is difficult to prove — Courts of law have to decide the cases strictly in accordance with law — If some allegations against somebody stand proved then definitely action should have been taken but in absence of proof no action could be taken — Nothing has been brought on record to show that promotion of the appellant was made on his representation — If high officials of the police department committed lapse by making rapid promotion its punishment cannot be given to the appellant. Zaheer-ud-din Qureshi v. Inspector General of Police AJ&K & 2 others 2003 SCR 381 (A) 1996 SCMR 413, PLD 1994 Lah.3, 2003 SCR 95 rel.
error: Content is protected !!